研究者情報

シバガキ　ユウゴ   SHIBAGAKI YUGO   柴垣有吾    所属   医学部医学科 腎臓・高血圧内科    職種   主任教授
論文種別	原著
言語種別	英語
査読の有無	査読あり
表題	Development of quality indicators for care of chronic kidney disease in the primary care setting using electronic health data: a RAND-modified Delphi method.
掲載誌名	正式名：Clinical and Experimental Nephrology ISSNコード：13421751
巻・号・頁	21(2),247-256頁
著者・共著者	Fukuma S, Shimizu S, Niihata K, Sada KE, Yanagita M, Hatta T, Nangaku M, Katafuchi R, Fujita Y, Koizumi J, Koizumi S, Kimura K, Fukuhara S, Shibagaki Y.
担当区分	最終著者
発行年月	2017/04
概要	Abstract BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has recently increased, and maintaining high quality of CKD care is a major factor in preventing end-stage renal disease. Here, we developed novel quality indicators for CKD care based on existing electronic health data. METHODS: We used a modified RAND appropriateness method to develop quality indicators for the care of non-dialysis CKD patients, by combining expert opinion and scientific evidence. A multidisciplinary expert panel comprising six nephrologists, two primary care physicians, one diabetes specialist, and one rheumatologist assessed the appropriateness of potential indicators extracted from evidence-based clinical guidelines, in accordance with predetermined criteria. We developed novel quality indicators through a four-step process: selection of potential indicators, first questionnaire round, face-to-face meeting, and second questionnaire round. RESULTS: Ten expert panel members evaluated 19 potential indicators in the first questionnaire round, of which 7 were modified, 12 deleted, and 4 newly added during subsequent face-to-face meetings, giving a final total of 11 indicators. Median rate of these 11 indicators in the final set was at least 7, and percentages of agreement exceeded 80 % for all but one indicator. All indicators in the final set can be measured using only existing electronic health data, without medical record review, and 9 of 11 are process indicators. CONCLUSION: We developed 11 quality indicators to assess quality of care for non-dialysis CKD patients. Strengths of the developed indicators are their applicability in a primary care setting, availability in daily practice, and emphasis on modifiable processes.
DOI	10.1007/s10157-016-1274-8